Project Management Review Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Project Management Review - Essay ExampleIt also functions as a wight in evaluating the presented change requests of the ascertain. Further, the Change Control Management also serves the function of managing and implementing the changes approved by the management. 2. riskiness Profile, its benefits to risk management A risk profile is a sequence of questions addressing the normal areas of the project where skepticism prevails. Going through the list of probable risks and by making use of the experience from the past, the management at a lower placesurface reduce the risk and increase the success rates. It eases the risk management since adopting previous approaches that were successful is less uncollectible than formulating new management strategies. 3. useable conflict, why encouraged Functional conflict means the disagreements of interests, ides or master(prenominal) concerns between the groups, individuals, or organizations. Or the deviations of terminations in the non-f ulfillment of the requirements of a job course, or process. Functional conflicts arise when the nominal to reasonable levels of conflicts develop the effectiveness of the team. Such conflict is considered to be constructive as it develops the quality of assessments, motivates creative thinking and novelty, and cheers up the inquisitiveness and interest among the team members. It target be used as a appliance to bring about an environment which airs the problems and releases the tension, and also promotes a stage for self-evaluation and modification. The functional conflicts usually arise if the testis objectives are overlapped, the role-descriptions are overlapped, the contractual bond is ambiguous, the assigned tasks are simultaneous, and if there exists any hidden intentions. Functional conflict can become an advantage to the firm. The project manager can encourage functional conflicts and can use them as antidotes for group thinking. The functional conflict questions the sta tus quo of the project and so there arises the necessity for creating new idea, promoting assessment of team goals and tasks, increasing the profitability to which the team would respond to alter. Project managers and team leading should carefully build conflicts into decision-making process. So they can surface and solve the measurable problems and also reconsider the decisions. 4. intravenous feeding major steps in facilitating the group decision-making process The project manager plays the central role in leading the teams decision making process. The project manager is not asked to make decision himself, but to create an atmosphere for the entire team to discuss and to reach a final possible solution in consensus ad idem. This does not bring a conclusion that each one of the group holds the solution cytosine percent instead it means that the entire group is agreeing up on the best decision under a situation. As Gray, Larson & Desai (2010, p. 360) note, there are four major steps that facilitate the group decision making process. I. Problem identification - When meeting with issues, the project manager should be careful not to limn the problems in terms of choices (e.g., whether to concentrate on X or Y?). Instead, he should detect the pilot program issues to which these alternatives are probable remedies. This process will enable the team members to formulate alternatives rather than just selecting among them. The important point of problem identification is to focus on the gap between the present state of the project and the desired sate of the project. II. Generating alternatives - When there is a general understanding of